Building an AI Feedback Pipeline
Turning an LLM response into structured, validated feedback that the product could actually use.
The Problem
A model can generate feedback, but a production learning platform needs more than generated text. The output has to be structured, validated, connected to scoring and student data, and reliable enough to become part of the actual learning workflow.
The Constraint
Assessment
The output needed to map back to the student’s submitted response.
Feedback
Feedback had to remain useful, clear, and reusable inside the product.
Scoring
Generated output still needed to work with predictable scoring logic.
Student Profiles
Evaluation data needed to connect back to each learner’s history and performance.
Personalisation
The system needed structured data that could support future personalised learning.
- AssessmentThe output needed to map back to the student’s submitted response.
- FeedbackFeedback had to remain useful, clear, and reusable inside the product.
- ScoringGenerated output still needed to work with predictable scoring logic.
- Student ProfilesEvaluation data needed to connect back to each learner’s history and performance.
- PersonalisationThe system needed structured data that could support future personalised learning.
Decision Rationale
Why We Chose The Approach
The Result
AI feedback became structured, validated, and reusable across the learning workflow.
In Retrospect
If I were building this again, I’d evaluate the pipeline around these questions:
- What happens when the model is wrong?
- What should remain deterministic, and where should domain rules override AI?
- How do we measure consistency across evaluations?